Buyer identity
Who is actually signing off, what they are responsible for, and what makes them look good or bad internally.
A buyer brief is the research layer your build already assumes exists. We deliver it ad-ready in days, with every claim marked validated or inferred, so nobody on your team has to guess how much weight a line carries.
Nothing in a brief exists to look thorough. Every section maps to a decision you have to make in the build.
Who is actually signing off, what they are responsible for, and what makes them look good or bad internally.
What they are really hiring your client to do, in their words. This becomes the H1 and the offer framing.
The outcome they are trying to avoid. Every objection on the page is a version of this fear wearing a suit.
The outcome worth paying for. This sets the proof you need and the CTA language that gets clicked.
Ranked, with the evidence each one needs. This becomes your section order, top to bottom.
Title tags, H1s, section sequence, and CTA copy tied back to the profile that justified them.
Most persona documents read with one confident voice, whether the line came from a customer interview or from someone’s intuition on a Tuesday. Ours don’t. Each claim carries its own evidence rating, so you know which lines you can put in an ad and which ones still need testing.
Traceable to a real source.
Reasoned, but not yet confirmed.
Format demonstration only. Real briefs are built from your client’s own data and sources.
The reason research eats a week inside an agency is that it starts from zero every time: new questions, new spreadsheet, new summary format, new argument about what it means. We run the same pipeline on every engagement, so the time goes into the thinking instead of the setup.
One form, one asset drop. We work from what you already collected in discovery instead of asking you to run a research project.
The same buyer questions every time, refined across engagements. Nothing gets invented mid-project.
The brief lands in the shape your build already needs, so no one has to translate it into a plan.
You send the client’s site, any sales calls or recordings, reviews, support threads, and the questions that keep coming up in discovery. If you have nothing, we start from the market.
Every fear, want, and objection gets traced to a source. Anything we cannot trace gets the inferred tag and a test that would confirm it.
The profile becomes page direction: title tags, H1s, section order, proof placement, and CTA language.
We take you and, if you want, your client through it. Most of the value shows up here, when the client hears their own buyer quoted back to them.
Every engagement is quoted per project. Bring the one that matches where you are.
One validated buyer profile for one client project. The way most agencies start, usually on a build that is already scoped.
Best for: proving the method on a live project.
The profile plus the page-by-page direction: titles, H1s, section order, proof placement, CTA copy.
Best for: a redesign where the structure is still open.
A brief for every project you take on, so research stops being a decision you re-argue with each client.
Best for: agencies selling strategy as a line item.
Pick the client build you are least sure about. That is the one where a validated profile changes the most.